MRSA infection of masticatory spaces in a paediatric patient
- 1 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal; Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE), Manipal, Karnataka, India
- 2 Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal; Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE), Manipal, Karnataka, India
- Correspondence to Dr Srikanth Gadicherla; srikanth.mds@manipal.edu
Abstract
Diagnosis of source of maxillofacial infection in paediatric patients can be challenging due to difficulty in eliciting a proper history and multiple potential sources of infection. Identification and removal of the nidus of infection with decompression and institution of antibiotic therapy as per the culture-sensitivity report form the mainstay treatment of the infection. Deviation from it may result in persistence or even progression of infection, resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. In the past decade, the incidence of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection in the oral cavity has seen an upward trend. This has further led to an increase in complexity in the diagnosis of maxillofacial infections. In this case, the authors want to bring to light the challenges faced in managing a paediatric patient with persistent fascial space infection even after removal of the offending tooth, which signifies the importance of managing the infection by the time-tested protocol.
Background
Fascial space infections are the common sequelae of the infections arising from teeth or the periodontium or the pericoronal tissues.1 Once these infections breach the confines of the cortical bone of the jaws, it results in the involvement of superficial and deep fascial spaces, commonly manifesting as facial swelling. If left untreated, these fascial infections can have serious complications like airway compromise due to Ludwig’s angina, descending necrotising mediastinitis, cavernous sinus thrombosis or brain abscess.2
In children, the diagnosis of the source of infection is challenging due to variable presentation, difficulty in eliciting a thorough history and multiple potential non-odontogenic source of infections. The involvement of masticatory spaces like pterygomandibular space does not manifest as significant facial swelling. Rather, it has a classic presentation of severely restricted mouth opening, which can further complicate the diagnosis. This delay in diagnosis and treatment in a paediatric patient leads to dehydration and early onset of systemic sepsis.3
Additionally, there have been increasing reports of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection in the oral cavity. Recent studies have shown that MRSA infection is not limited to hospital-acquired settings, and there have been cases of community-acquired MRSA infections of the skin and soft tissues. Owing to the high degree of morbidity and mortality associated with MRSA infection, it is essential to have an early diagnosis and start prompt treatment.
Herein, the authors report a clinical case that is unique in a few aspects, including the involvement of masticatory space, primarily a paediatric patient and isolation of MRSA microorganism from the site of infection. With this case, the authors want to emphasise the methods to form an early diagnosis so that appropriate treatment is started at the earliest, minimising the risk of complications.
Case presentation
An otherwise healthy 9-year-old girl reported to our hospital with swelling on the right side of the face for 2 weeks. History revealed that the patient resented with pain with respect to lower right deciduous molars and reported to a local hospital for the same. The patient was diagnosed with decayed deciduous molars and subsequently underwent extraction of the involved teeth 1 week ago and was discharged with oral antibiotics and analgesics. However, the patient noticed an increase in the swelling and pain over a period next 1 week. The patient then reported to our centre for further investigation and definitive management.
On extraoral examination, facial asymmetry was noted due to diffuse swelling of the right side of mid-face, which was tender on palpation with a local rise of temperature. The swelling extended from angle of the mandible to 1 cm posterior to the angle of mouth; however, the lower mandibular border was palpable (figure 1). Besides, the right submandibular lymph nodes were palpable and tender. Mouth opening was severely restricted to 6 mm, so a thorough intraoral examination could not be carried out. However, there was no swelling in the floor of the mouth with minimal obliteration of the right lower buccal vestibule.
Extraoral photograph depicting diffuse oedema of the right of face extending from angle of mouth to approximately 1 cm posterior to the right corner of mouth.

Investigations
At the time of presentation, the patient’s primary complaint was pain and severely restricted mouth opening. In the first examination, patient was afebrile, normotensive, but with mild tachycardia. A paediatric consultation was sought for an opinion regarding empiric antibiotherapy and fluid resuscitation. Initial laboratory workup showed mild leucocytosis to 14.8×103/mL with a left shift of neutrophil count.
Based on the history and clinical examination, a provisional diagnosis of right masticatory space infection was made. An orthopantomogram was advised as a screening X-ray, which did not reveal any significant finding. Developing right lower premolars with open apices were noted with no remnant root piece of the extracted deciduous molars (figure 2). A contrast-based CT scan was done to define the extent of swelling and localise the collection, if any. On evaluation of the CT scan by the radiologist, ill-defined lytic areas were noted involving the right ramus of mandible with few breaches in medial and lateral cortices. An adjacent hypodense collection measuring approximately 3.8×3.1×4.1 cm was noted along the medial and lateral aspect of the ramus with involvement of masticator spaces (figures 3 and 4).
Orthopantamogram did not reveal any significant sign of infection of the right mandibular region. They were developing succedaneous tooth in the relation of lower right second premolar underlying the extracted lower right deciduous first molar.

Coronal view of contrast-enhanced CT of the face shows hypodense collection on medial and lateral aspect of right ramus, suggestive of masticator space infection.

Axial view of contrast-enhanced CT of the face shows similar findings of right masticatory space infection. Adjacent inflammatory changes in the form of fat stranding can also be appreciated.

Differential diagnosis
Based on the clinical findings and correlation with the results of CT scan, diagnosis of right masticatory space infection with involvement of right submasseteric space and right pterygomandibular space was made. The space infection was attributed to being of odontogenic origin based on the history of teeth decay and extraction of the same.
Treatment
The patient was taken up for incision and drainage of the right submasseteric and right pterygomandibular space under general anaesthesia. Initially, a mouth gag was used to open the mouth forcefully. A vertical incision was given along the ascending ramus and blunt dissection done to reach the lateral ramus. The submasseteric space was reached using moult periosteal elevator and sinus forceps, which resulted in a spontaneous release of pus (figure 5). The pus samples were taken in swabs and sent for culture and sensitivity.
Intraoperative view shows oozing of pus from the right pterygomandibular space after it was approached via an incision placed along the anterior border of ascending ramus.

Similarly, the pterygomandibular space was explored through the same incision, while staying medial to the ramus. Minimal pus collection was noted in the pterygomandibular space. After thorough debridement, corrugated rubber drains were secured to both the spaces. Intraoperatively, maximal mouth opening of 28 mm was observed.
After the surgery, the patient was started on empirical antibiotic therapy of amoxicillin–clavulanic acid, metronidazole and gentamycin. After 48 hours, the culture and sensitivity report showed the presence of MRSA. Based on the sensitivity report, the patient was started on intravenous clindamycin (300 mg bd) for a total duration of 5 days. Regular debridement of the surgical site was done through the drains for 4 days. Also, a rigorous mouth opening exercise was done regularly.
With the regular debridement, physiotherapy and antibiotic therapy as per the culture-sensitivity report, there was significant improvement in the mouth opening along with resolution of infection symptoms. Once the drain site did not show any collection for the 24-hour period, the drains were removed, and the site closed.
Outcome and follow-up
The patient was discharged after 7 days and was continued on oral antibiotics (clindamycin) for another 3 days and was advised regarding mouth opening exercises. On 10-day follow-up, the patient showed significant improvement in mouth opening (maximal mouth opening of 25 mm) and complete resolution of the infection (figure 6)
One-week postoperative follow-up picture shows an acceptable mouth opening of 25 mm with the resolution of infection.

Discussion
The management of fascial space infections remains troublesome due to the complex anatomy of the region, polymicrobial aetiology and its possible communication with the surrounding deep neck spaces and other critical regions, which can lead to fatal complications. Infection gets further compounded in a paediatric patient because the disease can progress quickly, producing symptoms like severe dehydration, fever and potential airway complications. It is prudent that the appropriate treatment is initiated at the earliest while the infection is localised to a certain fascial space before it progresses to a systemic disease.4 5
Unlike the adult population in whom the cause for fascial space infection is majorly odontogenic cause, the fascial space infection in the paediatric age group can be attributed to both odontogenic and non-odontogenic cause in a significant proportion of patients. The involvement of the upper facial region in children is generally associated with acute symptoms and, more commonly, unknown or non-odontogenic aetiology, whereas the lower facial infections in children are found to be of odontogenic aetiology in the majority of the cases and tend to have lesser variability with regards to the causative microorganisms.6–8 Hence, the localisation of infection can help in identifying the origin of the source of infection. Various studies have shown that the more commonly involved fascial spaces in the paediatric age group are submandibular space, submental space and canine space. The involvement of masticatory spaces in fascial space infection has varied between 1.8% and 12%.9 10 The presentation of symptoms of trismus is considered to be characteristic of involvement of any of the masticator space, viz, temporal spaces, submasseteric spaces or pterygomandibular spaces. The presentation of severe trismus in the current case, along with a history of lower tooth pain, was indicative of a possible masticator space infection.
Management of any fascial space infection depends on the severity of infection, disease progression and immune status of the host. It is recommended that any fascial space infection should be managed aggressively in the form of antimicrobial therapy with the removal of foci of infection and surgical debridement. However, there has been enough evidence supporting relatively less aggressive management in paediatric age group in the form of pulp extirpation or tooth extraction along with antibiotic therapy if the disease in its early stage. Michael and Hibbert,11 in 2014, provided an algorithm for the management of paediatric patients presenting with facial cellulitis in which they recommended that management of infection in its early stage on an outpatient basis in the form of RCT or extraction under antibiotic coverage. However, if the disease showed signs of worsening, or the patient reported in the advanced stage, they recommended that the patient be admitted and managed by surgical debridement. In a retrospective study by Lin and Lu,12 only 25% of paediatric patients presenting with facial cellulitis required immediate surgical incision and drainage. In contrast, the others were managed with antimicrobial therapy and root canal treatment (RCT) or extraction of the involved tooth once the facial swelling had resolved. They recommended delaying the dental or surgical intervention after the subsidence of the facial swelling by antimicrobial therapy.
Even though the patient in the current case had undergone treatment in the form of removal of foci of infection by extraction of the right mandibular deciduous molars along with the institution of empirical antibiotic therapy (amoxicillin), the patient continued to deteriorate and developed fascial space infections. We did not have enough evidence to conclude whether the patient had signs of masticator space infection at the time of initial presentation, which should have been managed by aggressive treatment in the form of incision and drainage.
A more rational explanation for worsening symptoms would be the presence of MRSA microorganisms that showed resistance to the conventional empirical antibiotic therapy. Conventionally, the odontogenic fascial space infections have turned out to be polymicrobial with S. aureus and Streptococcus being the most commonly cultured microorganisms followed by Neisseria and diphtheroids.13 However, there is increasing evidence suggesting that more MRSA microorganisms are being isolated from the oral cavity. McCormack et al in 2015 reported the incidence of MRSA microorganisms to be 10% in the oral cavity of all the 11 312 specimens they studied.14 Mungul and Maharaj10 reported a relatively low incidence of 1.8% for the presence of MRSA in paediatric patients with deep neck space infections. However, a study conducted in the Indian scenario by Showkat et al 9 showed the presence of MRSA bacteria in as high as 50% of the paediatric patients with deep neck abscess.
MRSA infections have known to possess a significant risk in terms of morbidity, mortality and financial implications. The delay in appropriate treatment for superficial fascial spaces for MRSA infection can lead to its rapid progression to deeper neck spaces, which can pose life-threatening complications. A relatively fatal complication of necrotising fasciitis due to MRSA infection of deep neck spaces has also been reported.15 As per Cochrane review, linezolid is considered to be the most effective drug in combating MRSA infection. However, they should be reserved for the last resort and used with caution due to its associated complications.16 As per the culture-sensitivity report in our case, the patient was started on clindamycin, which resulted in the resolution of the infection.
Even though there have been multiple studies showing the presence of MRSA in the oral cavity and transmission of infection in the dental operatory, in last 5 years, there has been only one case report outlining the management of MRSA patient in a dental set-up.17 The significance of the case lies in the fact that despite the norm to try and manage the paediatric infections by a conservative means, the judgement regarding surgical intervention needs to be taken based on the clinical scenario. Even if what might appear as a benign infection, removal of the infection foci may not suffice if the proper antibiotic therapy is not instituted as in the cases of MRSA infections.
Learning points
-
There should be a minimum delay in the institution of treatment in patients with evidence of maxillofacial infections. It is even more important in a paediatric patient who tends to deteriorate rapidly in the absence of appropriate treatment.
-
The time-tested method of managing infections should be followed, which includes removal of the source of infection; drainage, decompression, and debridement; and appropriate antibiotic therapy with supportive care in the form of nutrition and hydration.
-
With the evolution of microbial flora, there has been an increase in the incidence of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection in the maxillofacial region in the past decade. Empirical antibiotic therapy should be initiated at the earliest; however, every attempt should be made to send the pus sample, if available, for culture sensitivity and modify the antibiotic therapy as per the report.
Footnotes
-
Contributors The authors AS and KS were involved in the conception and design of the manuscript. The treatment planning and management was done by AS, SN and SG. The article drafting was done by AS and KS, and it was further critically revised by SN and SG The final approval of the draft manuscript was obtained from all the authors concerned. All the authors agree to be accountable for the article and ensure that all the questions regarding the accuracy and integrity of the article have been investigated and resolved.
-
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
-
Competing interests None declared.
-
Patient consent for publication Parental/guardian consent obtained.
-
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
- © BMJ Publishing Group Limited 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
References
Use of this content is subject to our disclaimer